git ssb

%mMd+625YFJXxmtDDghUBiVR4jUIqHT+ynlFakBHSWlQ=.sha256

{
  "previous": "%cBnsmf2SgEw0/6o4aECVAW7zN73mQiZm7n9U0EdSsQ0=.sha256",
  "author": "@EMovhfIrFk4NihAKnRNhrfRaqIhBv1Wj8pTxJNgvCCY=.ed25519",
  "sequence": 1879,
  "timestamp": 1460111938149,
  "hash": "sha256",
  "content": {
    "type": "post",
    "text": "@dust questioned [coinage of term \"cypherspace\"](%xnTyizDltnQkWiTNe3r2B7W3UAgzoTHGiv4PHTQLZmQ=.sha256)\n\n>a catch all term, for all cryptographically secure p2p systems: i.e, bitcoin, bittorrent, ipfs, ethereum, zeronet, secure-scuttlebutt, space or structures held together by \"cypherlinks\"\n\nwhat I recall is @substack suggested \"cypherlink\" as the term for a hash used as a link (also called a merkle link in ipfs) which I liked because it sounded like a riff on \"hyperlink\" and \"cypherpunk\". After that, \"cypherspace\" was pretty obvious.\n\nI was staying with @substack and @johnny at the time. The design I had planned was [cyphernet](https://gist.github.com/dominictarr/5990143) but switched to the secure-scuttlebutt design because it was simpler and had more predictable replication performance.",
    "mentions": [
      {
        "link": "@/02iw6SFEPIHl8nMkYSwcCgRWxiG6VP547Wcp1NW8Bo=.ed25519",
        "name": "dust"
      },
      {
        "link": "%xnTyizDltnQkWiTNe3r2B7W3UAgzoTHGiv4PHTQLZmQ=.sha256"
      },
      {
        "link": "@vt8uK0++cpFioCCBeB3p3jdx4RIdQYJOL/imN1Hv0Wk=.ed25519",
        "name": "substack"
      },
      {
        "link": "@dnr1swLSAgf36g+FzGjNLgmytj2IIyDaYeKZ7F5GdzY=.ed25519",
        "name": "johnny"
      }
    ]
  },
  "signature": "p2MqxlPmXvHjLS/8zchvHl34L4h3Vx+gB3Y3lsufHuZwy+uS6UJFUfvM1Aen1CA1a0txgJlp3ES5Y1Fzkq7nCw==.sig.ed25519"
}