git ssb

%dWoLSSSqMtj5qtT1PmVPRwguH86UBJFIzB4TpTNRJg8=.sha256

{
  "previous": "%vxdBBElLpqRW/AX91zoYiI/qh6ujuBJz0U/SRLCGrD8=.sha256",
  "author": "@EMovhfIrFk4NihAKnRNhrfRaqIhBv1Wj8pTxJNgvCCY=.ed25519",
  "sequence": 9698,
  "timestamp": 1502232593428,
  "hash": "sha256",
  "content": {
    "type": "post",
    "root": "%3cWZHeN6k03XpvDBxrxP5bGLsNByFLTvr/rKYFV4f+c=.sha256",
    "branch": [
      "%6X8diYZ9Kb71stVBqmBN8dR3AxfkNxyNlb08T6IM1X8=.sha256",
      "%xRRiYQhkHu6mk5Ed5kkprQgUQbCbh/ZPZZT7LIRDyiA=.sha256"
    ],
    "channel": "nomic",
    "text": "[@soggypretzels](@3PGWnoMIY5ebs6sJjkwc7DKjxrgcrOeIUC2YegkMtIY=.ed25519) I see your branch, but you need to create a PR in the webui or patchbay (similar flow to github)\n\nbtw, I think the rule change you currently propose is in voilation of 111:\n\n> If a rule-change as proposed is unclear, ambiguous, paradoxical, or destructive of play, or if it _arguably consists of two or more rule-changes compounded_\n\nand rule 103:\n\n> A rule-change is any of the following: (1) the enactment, repeal, **or** amendment of a mutable rule;\n\nI think we need to more urgently clarify the meaning of \"player\" but it's your turn (by rule 201)",
    "mentions": [
      {
        "link": "@3PGWnoMIY5ebs6sJjkwc7DKjxrgcrOeIUC2YegkMtIY=.ed25519",
        "name": "soggypretzels"
      }
    ]
  },
  "signature": "EmNgRk6ke3gq31qyGTYXI2Njf/1B0mOLmmU2voNQqg1o784hJzccm7/jcRec/KkB+NmQ2NVbfKEZCk/uJ31QAA==.sig.ed25519"
}